AMAZING ARTICLES #1:
BIG BANG VS. LITTLE POP
"sooner or later, any valid theorem is going to be invalidated."
Each government on our
Planet today is desperate to get/grab
anything that belongs to the
"unexplained", to UFOs, or to any historical technology secrets.
"desperate" is not the right word; they are capable of ANYTHING to get
their hands on those artifacts, secrets,
whatever. The idea is, each country/nation strives to achieve "technological supremacy" and
the "absolute domination". Now, considering the social-psychology point of view, that
behavior is common and natural. Still, the troublesome aspect is the official propaganda:
are no unexplained things, there are no UFOs, and historical technological secrets do not exist; everything is
just ordinary and normal--and most people believe in it.
Well, that "natural" social mentality is due to a state of very low, real, average social intelligence
exists today in our Human Society, everywhere. It is possible in about 100 years from this time one country on our
dear Planet should achieve that "technological supremacy", therefore it
may enslave all other nations.
If such a dire perspective would become reality, people are going to discover that
technological power is not sufficient; better said, technological power
is far from anything. Should you have little patience, you may discover what
is way, way more powerful and important than technology is, in these
Amazing Articles--of our SF books.
As a note, we do not try to sell anything to anyone. If you want to
learn, that is just perfect with us, and we can even help you. However, if you like to
in/with your life, then our
advice to you is, "play as hard as you can, bubba, forever!"
It is not easy to decide on the most interesting topic for a first article. Anyway, after many
painful sacrifices, we settled for the birth of our Universe: the great Big Bang itself!
Now, the Big-Bang theory
started spreading among the scientists around the beginning of the twentieth century,
after the English translation of
the Sanskrit Veda poems was published in 1899. [So much for
"scientific inspiration"; religious poems!]
The "Big Bang" theory says,
"The Universe has a cyclic evolution. It starts
with a single invisible point--named 'a singularity', by
most scientists--which contains the entire mass of the
Universe, including space and time. Next, the little
invisible point explodes in a 'Big Bang', then matter,
space, and time appear as we know them.
Of course, matter appears as the basic atomic
particles/components at first, and they need to group
themselves together to form atoms, molecules, stars,
planetary systems, and in the end the Galaxies. The Universe
continues to expand for billions of years, then it should
stop its motion; next, it begins collapsing. The collapsing
of our Universe continues until a new singularity point is
formed, and a new cycle is 'bound' to start again."
Big Bang theory was explained the first time after the
Indian Veda poems were translated and published in 1899 [the
Big Bang theory is graphically described in those religious poems
estimated to be about 7000-10000 years old]. However, please note this:
that exceptional translation was performed, at that time,
according to our mechanical capacity of understanding the
Universe. In other words, we understand the science of
the Universe only if it is explained "mechanically".
This is our actual level of Civilization: mechanical! In
reality, things are far from being mechanical in nature, and
we have no doubt that this aspect is perfectly well
documented in the original Veda poems. However, the problem
is, we cannot understand whatever is not mechanical in
nature. We are certain that the first translators have
added a little "mechanical touch" to the entire picture, in
order to make some sense out of those incredibly advanced
Note that the Big-Bang theory does not hold water, and many
scientists know it very well. Today, when a new star is
born, there is no Bang at all. Fact is, the wave sounds do
not travel through vacuum--they cannot do it. Therefore, why
should it be such a Big Bang the very first time when there
was actually no space/vacuum at all?
Now, if it was a Big Bang or not, that is totally not
important. However, this absurd naming used reflects
perfectly clear our actual capacity of understanding
reality. A "Big Bang" suggests a mechanical explosion, and
this "mechanical picture" makes perfect sense to most of
NOTE ADDED IN JANUARY 2015
In 2014 we noticed that National Geographic and Discovery have
issued series of documentaries that seem to copy most of the topics
presented in our Amazing Articles (first written between 2004-2007). Honestly, we
at first thinking
that our Amazing Articles had become obsolete. There was no way--we
thought--we could compete with all those superb exquisite pictures and movies
provided by NASA. They say an image is worth a thousand
Naturally, we decided to analyze those documentaries in some details;
this is how we came up with a few . . . let's say, interesting conclusions.
recent readers of our Amazing Articles may think that it is us
(COROLLARY THEOREMS / COMPLEMENT CONTROL) who are copying the National Geographic &
Discovery topics/ideas, we decided to publish our mentioned
1. Fact is there is nothing to worry, for us. Although those documentaries
are professionally made, and they are really interesting, they lack
little "true substance"--they do not go for the
jugular, as our Amazing Articles do it. All of them stop short from telling/describing
"the entire picture"--most likely, they do not know
the entire picture.
On the other hand, it is clear to us that all
those great scientists (backed by very rich governments) who are
presenting "advanced theories, bold hypotheses, and even
absurd impossibilities" still have a lot to learn--sorry
for this. To all of them, we
recommend as a relaxed first lecture our SF books. Amazingly, it
seems there is far more true
science in our SF books, compared to their actual (heftily funded) scientific
endeavors! As a corollary, their scientific theories contain way
more irrational fantasy than our books do.
This is nobody's fault/blame. Since the
scientists started discovering the (scientific) Universe, for
about five decades by now, the ACT OF CREATION proved to be so
extraordinary, that the scientists started believing that any SF
story/legend can be perfectly true/real. Fact is they are right,
except there are still some (troublesome) scientific limits to
our fantastic reality--which lead to even more incredible
2. Now, in addition to a stunningly limited scientific perspective
(from our point of view only), we
have clearly identified traces of PROPAGANDA! Yes, Sir, all those
"advanced", "futuristic", "scientific" documentaries are
riddled with propaganda. Just a feeble example, they use exclusively
the term "Moon", in order to name "a natural satellite". Why?
Moon is the proper name of Ter-Ra's natural satellite only. Same thing
the noun Sun used to name in English our star Ra. There are no more Suns in the
all are just "stars". However, those subtle improperly used terms are
meant to suggest the idea of "Earthly commonality within our
close, ordinary, horizon"--not nice.
3. Anyway, note that the organizations and the Governs that have funded those very
nice documentaries--we suspect, also fairly expensive--need to
recover the costs, somehow, therefore things are pushed even further than
Propaganda, into the very realm of "profitable Commercial!" You see
in order for commercial activities to continue uninterrupted,
E-VERY-THING has been painted in "funny, nice, and pink!"
THAT surely is some "lucrative science!"
To end this appropriately, no dear readers, an image is never worth a
thousand words/pages. In fact, an image without THE proper
words is frequently interpreted exactly in reverse! Unexplained or
wrongly explained images are the very definition of Propaganda! In
the other side, there are words that cannot be explained not even in
one billion movies.
Consider the word "love" for example: for
thousand of years countless books have been written trying to
describe love. Recently, we made tens of thousand of movies about
love; however, that word is still a mystery to many of us . . . On
the other hand, there are many other words, even more important than
Most of the scientists, today, agree with the Big Bang theory. Even more, famous ancient texts, as are
Ramayana and Mahabharata,
prove that our ancestors, fine Ladies and Gentlemen, were well familiar with the Big Bang theory
7000-10000 years ago! Now, the true beauty about this Big Bang theory is, it is not quite clear regarding particular
aspects, and that is very good news, because it leaves plenty of room for further investigations.
One thing is certain: there was one initial moment in time when our Universe appeared (this is the Big Bang
moment itself), and we named it, Time Zero. Before Time Zero, some scientists consider there was NOTHING, meaning, no
matter, no space, and no time. Other scientists say, the entire mass of the Universe was
contracted in a
single, invisible point named--poetically only, without any scientific fundament--"a singularity".
To us, the
NOTHING hypothesis makes far more sense.
Further form Time Zero, there is a nice sequence of events dealing with the formation of the first quarks, the
first atoms and, in the end, with the formation of the Galaxies themselves. That sequence of events is very
. . .
"scientific", except it doesn't work. A quick search on the Internet for
is going to reveal many thorny aspects regarding the moments before and after
the Big Bang in general and, in
particular, about the formation of Galaxies, Planetary Systems, etc.
It is very interesting to note that before Time Zero we had a big bunch of
NOTHING which decided suddenly to explode in a Big Bang. We do not deny
that there was absolutely NOTHING before Time Zero--that is, nothing from our
Atomic Universe--but we are not quite certain it was such a Big
Bang afterwards. Why not a first, tiny, Little Pop of a single quark, or even of one hydrogen proton? Of course, after that first,
timid pop of matter, many others could be heard/seen popping/flourishing up like
. . . popcorns!
The most important aspect, however, is the initial state: the NOTHING itself. Yes, there was no matter, no space,
and no time, but that is only from our point of view, from this side of the now existing
Atomic Universe. In the
other side, in the Subatomic Universe, time was, and it has always
been, in its rightful place, and the Certitude
Factors were preparing for that first Little Pop of matter. After Time Zero, our Atomic Universe came into
existence with matter, space, and with its own time. Following the Little Pop of atomic matter, the Subatomic
Primary Energies led to the formation and expansion of what would later became the "buds" of
the incredibly beautiful Galaxies we have today.
In NASA's website you can discover a few pictures of Galaxies. No doubt
about it, there is nothing more beautiful in the Universe than the image of some
Galaxies and Nebula; please take a look at
The Subatomic Universe is the one responsible for many mysteries
connected to the formation of Galaxies, of Planetary Systems, and of some
strange astronomical objects as are pulsars, neutron stars, black holes,
etc. Now, what is that intriguing Subatomic Universe? The most advanced theories officially
accepted today regarding the Subatomic (this is the next level
from quark further down) are the "String Theory"
and the "M Theory". Sure, both theories are very
interesting, developed from complex advanced mathematical models but, again, they are not quite consistent.
As a note only, Einstein didn't agree with the Big Bang Theory: he considered the Universe
was a static system.
Wow, A STATIC SYSTEM! That is stunningly perplexing since it came from someone who has postulated
the Theory of
Relativity! Anyway, there are many other theories regarding the birth of the Universe, although none is as popular
as the Big Bang one.
The scenario presented graphically in this page (the two pictures above) is based on
a few theories
from MERCY, and Three Stories.
theories are far more advanced than anything ever mentioned before,
entire History of our Human Civilization. Hard to believe this, isn't
it? Well . . .
First published on September 6, 2004
© SC COMPLEMENT CONTROL SRL. All rights reserved.
» BACK TO TOP